Three complementary methods price a reinsurance layer: burning cost, experience rating and exposure rating.
Following the CAS/SOA framework (Clark, Basics of Reinsurance Pricing), a reinsurance layer is priced with three complementary lenses.
The simplest experience-based method: historical losses to the layer, divided by exposure (often premium), trended and developed.
Uses the cedant's own historical losses, capped and developed to the layer, to estimate the expected loss cost. Reliable when the data are credible and representative; weak for high, rarely-penetrated layers.
Uses industry exposure curves or increased limits factors (ILFs) to allocate the expected loss to the layer, independent of the cedant's own experience. Essential when experience is thin or the layer is high. See exposure curves.
Best practice blends experience and exposure estimates by credibility \\(Z\\):
The technical premium loads the expected loss for expenses, cost of capital and profit, and for the risk (volatility) of the layer, often via a standard-deviation or a risk-adjusted (utility / distortion) principle.
Partner with a reinsurer that combines technical discipline, financial strength and deep regional insight.
Start a conversation