A core Power Re specialty, reinsurance for employer-sponsored and affinity group life schemes, offering stability and cost-efficiency at portfolio scale.
Group life schemes concentrate many lives under a single master policy, creating both scale efficiency and accumulation risk. Power Re supports cedants with proportional capacity to grow their books and non-proportional catastrophe cover to protect against single-event mortality shocks.
Power Re approaches this line as a specialist: we assess each risk on its own merits, price it with actuarial rigor, and structure cover that genuinely fits the cedant’s exposure and objectives, never a one-size template.
The structures we most often deploy for this line, proportional and non-proportional, tailored to your book.
Proportional capacity to support growth and smooth results across the scheme.
Retain small risks, cede the surplus above your retained line on larger lives.
Protection against multi-life losses from a single catastrophic event.
What we focus on when we underwrite this line.
Employer and affinity schemes with sound administration, clear eligibility and credible experience.
We price with credibility-weighted experience and exposure rating, and cap single-event exposure with catastrophe XoL calibrated to the largest concentration of lives.
The frequency and severity models we use to price this line, and the loss it aggregates to.
| Age x | q_x per 1,000 |
|---|---|
| 30 | 1.0 |
| 40 | 1.8 |
| 50 | 4.2 |
| 55 | 6.5 |
| 60 | 10.5 |
| 65 | 17.0 |
| 70 | 27.0 |
Illustrative one-year mortality rates. Actual pricing uses recognized valuation and industry mortality tables.
How the frequency, severity and catastrophe models above turn into numbers.
A group scheme covers n lives; life i aged x has a one-year mortality rate \(q_{x}\). The number of deaths D is a sum of independent Bernoulli trials, and expected claims aggregate the sums assured.
For a homogeneous group with common rate q, \(D\sim\mathrm{Binomial}(n,q)\) with variance \(nq(1-q)\); when q is small and n large, D is well approximated by a Poisson.
A scheme of 1000 lives with average \(q=2.5\) per 1000 and average sum assured 100. Expected deaths \(E[D]=1000\times 0.0025=2.5\); expected claims \(E[S]=2.5\times 100=250\). The standard deviation of deaths is \(\sqrt{1000\times 0.0025\times 0.9975}\approx 1.58\), so small schemes are volatile.
The Poisson model gives the full distribution \(P(D=k)=e^{-\lambda}\lambda^{k}/k!\), which drives the price of the tail and the need for catastrophe cover.
With \(\lambda=2.5\): \(P(0\text{ deaths})=e^{-2.5}\approx 8.2\%\), and \(P(D\ge 6)\approx 4.2\%\). A six-death year produces claims of 600 against an expected 250, a 2.4x overshoot, exactly the volatility reinsurance absorbs.
Group schemes concentrate lives, so a single event, a transport disaster or a workplace accident, can affect many at once. This accumulation is transferred with catastrophe excess of loss.
Catastrophe XoL 5000 xs 1000. An accident kills 20 insured lives with average sum assured 100, a 2000 loss. The reinsurer pays \(\min(\max(2000-1000,0),5000)=1000\); the cedant keeps 1000.
For an established scheme, Power Re blends the scheme’s own mortality experience \(\bar X\) with the standard table \(\mu\) using a credibility factor Z (Bühlmann-Straub), weighted by exposure m.
A scheme’s 5-year experience shows \(\bar X=3.0\) per 1000 against a table \(\mu=2.5\). With exposure \(m=5000\) life-years and \(k=15000\), \(Z=5000/20000=0.25\), so the credibility mortality is \(\hat q=0.25\times 3.0+0.75\times 2.5=2.625\) per 1000.
The discipline is the same across every line we write.
We assess each risk on its merits and let marginal business go, growth by quality, not volume.
Experience and exposure rating, credibility-weighted, load the price for volatility and cost of capital.
Clear limits manage concentration by event, geography and cedant across the portfolio.
Fast, fair and transparent claims handling, the moment our promise is tested.
Deep technical knowledge of the line and of the Latin American market.
A timely yes or no, with terms and capacity you can rely on.
13× regulatory solvency coverage and a disciplined retrocession program.
We co-design programs and stand with cedants through the cycle.
Partner with a reinsurer that combines technical discipline, financial strength and deep regional insight.
Start a conversation